Rep. Brady of the 9th District of Texas, said in the Houston Chronicle yesterday that he did not agree with all the Pork in the bill, but did agree with the basis of the bill. First of all, he should have said no on ALL of the bill, but I think that if he disagrees with the "pork", he should place a no on the bill and state what he disagrees about the pork, or the idea of the pork being in the bill.
He never said he disagreed with what else was in the bill, he just said it didn't need these attachments to the bill, and I'm a little disappointed by my congressmen to say the least. Unfortunately, with how the districting is done, the chances of him not getting re-elected are nearly impossible.
No comments:
Post a Comment